|
Becoming Critical:
Evaluating Internet Resources
ISTC 301 Utilization of
Instructional Media
Tricia Ryan, Instructor
Web
Evaluation #1 | Web Evaluation #2
Name: Sara Harrelson
Web
Evaluation #1 NCIP: National Center to Improve
Practice in Special Education through Technology, Media and Materials. http://www2.edc.org/NCIP
|
Authorship |
| Expertise
Is the author well
known in the field of study? Are credentials listed? Is
biographical information presented? Does the web page link to another
document that you can trust?
This website is designed by
Education Development Center, Inc., however, this site is apart of the
National Center to Improve Practice (NCIP). This organization is
funded by the U.S. Department of Education. There are several links
to other documents that talk about Special Education. These links
provide video profiles, technology resources, and a library of
resources.
|
| Publishing
Organization
Is the name of an
organization given? Are there any distinctive features that identify the
source as a scholarly web site? Is the organization recognized in
the field? Is the web page stored on the author's personal account,
at an educational institution, or part of an official web site?
The name of the organization is
given: National Center to Improve Practice which is a subdivision of the
Educational Development Center, Inc. The distinctive features that
identify the source as a scholarly web site are the wide variety of
information given. They not only give you information about special
education but they tell you about technologies and how to integrate them
into the classroom. This account is recognized in the field of
special education. This web page is stored as a part of an official
web site.
|
| Point of view/ Bias
Are viewpoints and
images bias-free?
Yes, viewpoints and images are
bias-free. They provide material well with use of categorizing
different disabilities and age groups.
|
|
Content |
| Accuracy
Was the information presented
error-free? Can the background information be verified? Is the
information current? How do you know?
The information presented seem to
be error-free. This information on the web site was last updated in
1998. So, there could be some new techniques of teaching that are
not available, but they still seem to be quite accurate. |
| Appropriateness
Is the information relevant to
Maryland K-12 curriculum?
Yes
Is the interaction compatible with
the physical and intellectual maturity of intended audience? What
leads you to your conclusion? Yes,
because the information provided is focused on special education and
integrating technology and other techniques into the classroom. |
| Scope
Is there a logical progression of
topics presented in the website?
Yes
Does the information adequately
cover the topic for the intended audience?
Yes |
|
Technical Aspects |
| Navigation
Do images load
quickly? Is there an intuitive design that fosters independent use?
Are standard multimedia formats used?
Yes.
|
| Presentation
Does the site follow good
principles of web design? Are the pages uncluttered? Are there
captions, labels, or alternative text for all visuals? Do graphics
support the content, not merely decorative? Does the presentation of
information capture and hold the users' attention?
This web site follows good
principles of web design. The pages are uncluttered and there are
captions, labels and all alternative text used for visual aides.
Graphics in this website support the content. This presentation of
information captures and holds the user's attention.
|
|
Personal
Assessment |
| Would you recommend
this site? Why or why not?
Yes, because I feel that it
provides a simple yet efficient information that can be used and
processed easily. It can give the user a full understanding of
special education and how it could be at its best. It provides a
clean presentation that is not cluttered and holds the viewers attention.
|
Web Evaluation #2 Marc Sheehan's Special
Education/Exceptionality Page http://www.halcyon.com/marcs/sped.html
|
Authorship |
| Expertise
Is the author well
known in the field of study? Are credentials listed? Is
biographical information presented? Does the web page link to another
document that you can trust?
The author seems to know his
stuff. He has made his own lesson plans and links to other web sites
of information about special education. His main purpose was to
organize a site with a bunch of links to special education
information. The links are trust worthy.
|
| Publishing
Organization
Is the name of an
organization given? Are there any distinctive features that identify the
source as a scholarly web site? Is the organization recognized in
the field? Is the web page stored on the author's personal account,
at an educational institution, or part of an official web site?
The name of the organization is not
given due to this is a sub page of the author's home page. This site
may not be a scholarly web site but it does link you to several of
them.
|
| Point of view/ Bias
Are viewpoints and
images bias-free?
Yes.
|
|
Content |
| Accuracy
Was the information presented
error-free? Can the background information be verified? Is the
information current? How do you know?
The information seems to be
error-free. The background information of the author seems to me
that he is a special education educator because he has several lesson
plans in this field listed and for various age groups in elementary school
on several subjects. |
| Appropriateness
Is the information relevant to
Maryland K-12 curriculum?
Yes.
Is the interaction compatible with
the physical and intellectual maturity of intended audience? What
leads you to your conclusion?
Yes, because the lesson plans
provides not only education for the mind but also for education for the
physical needs which also makes learning fun. |
| Scope
Is there a logical progression of
topics presented in the website?
Yes.
Does the information adequately
cover the topic for the intended audience?
Yes.
|
|
Technical Aspects |
| Navigation
Do images load
quickly? Is there an intuitive design that fosters independent use?
Are standard multimedia formats used?
Images load quickly
and the site is basically a bunch of links to other websites with the
exception of lesson plans and resource pages.
|
| Presentation
Does the site follow good
principles of web design? Are the pages uncluttered? Are there
captions, labels, or alternative text for all visuals? Do graphics
support the content, not merely decorative? Does the presentation of
information capture and hold the users' attention?
The site follows good principles of
a web design and pages are uncluttered. The graphics do not support
the topics. There is only one graphic that is an American Flag. The
information may capture the user's attention but since it is so
plainly set up in a list, the user's attention may not be held.
|
|
Personal
Assessment |
| Would you recommend
this site? Why or why not?
I would recommend this site only
because it gives you a variety of other websites and lesson plans that may
aide a teacher or a parent in the special education field. |
Other exceptional websites:
1. NCIP: National Center to Improve
Practice in Special Education through Technology, Media and Materials.
http://www2.edc.org/NCIP
This site, funded by the U.S. Department
of Education, was designed to promote the effective use of technology to enhance
educational outcomes for children with special needs. This site aides teachers with
integrating technology into the class, meeting the needs of special education.
2. Closing the Gap: Computer
Technology in Special Education and Rehabilitation.
http://www.closingthegap.com
This site, Closing the Gap:
Computer Technology in Special Education and Rehabilitation, provides the
viewers with a variety of information on working and teaching special education.
3. SERI: Special Education
Resources on the Internet.
http://seriweb.com
This site provides users with several
resources that include discussion groups, information on learning disabilities
and technology and special education.
4. Internet Resources for Special
Children
http://www.irsc.org:8080/irsc/irscmain.nsf
This website is a directory for resources
on the internet to aide others in a special education field.
5. Federal Resource Center for Special
Education
http://www.dssc.org/frc
This website is designed to support the
nationwide technical assistance network to respond to the needs of students of
special disabilities.
6. Special Education
http://specialed.about.com
This website provides facts about special
education and gives information about events and techniques that can be used
when teaching or working with special education.
7. The Special Education Homepage
http://specialed.freeyellow.com
This website neatly organizes a wide
variety of resources and web pages into one, and is very easy to manage.
8. Marc Sheehan's Special
Education/Exceptionality Page
http://www.halcyon.com/marcs/sped.html
This is a website designed to combine all
sorts of links to the topic of special education. This site also provides
examples of lesson plans and educational resources.
9. Inclusion
http://www.uni.edu/coe/inclusion/
This website discusses how inclusive
education can be accomplished through links and resources list.
10. Special Education Resources
http://www.specialednet.com/resources.htm
This website provides a resource list for
inclusive education. This provides teachers and parents with information
about teaching, discipline, government, and so much more.
Maryland
Teacher Technology Standards:
I. Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and Application
Outcome:
Candidates will access, evaluate and process information efficiently and
effectively.
Indicators:
- Identify, locate, retrieve, and differentiate among a variety of
electronic sources of information using technology. - Evaluate
information critically and competently for a specific purpose. - Organize,
categorize and store information for efficient retrieval.
V.
Integrating Technology into the Curriculum and Instruction
Outcome:
Design, implement and assess learning experiences that incorporate student use
of technology to support inquiry, problem solving, communication and/ or
collaboration.
Indicators:
- Evaluate technology materials and media to determine their most appropriate
instructional use.
VII.
Professional Growth
Outcome:
Develop habits of mind that support continual learning and professional growth
in technology.
Indicators:
- Identify and use resources and materials to support professional growth in the
use of technology. - Identify local, state and national standards and use them
to improve teaching and learning
Last updated by Sara Harrelson on 3/12/02
|